The Hidden Cost of Fragmented Systems

Fragmentation is Inefficient and expensive

Companies are investing heavily in AI, automation, and analytics, but many teams still feel like they’re stuck experimenting or, worse, fighting fires with the new shiny tool (Insert your AI Agents). The problem is the systems behind them are disconnected, hard to align, and often out of step with how the business actually runs.

Across the enterprise, systems were never truly designed to connect and collaborate (surprise surprise). Business data and decisions in multiple apps. Data pipelines exist in silos. Models are built and deployed in isolation. Workflows are designed department by department with no system-level connectivity. Even AI itself is often inserted as a patch, not embedded as a shared decision layer. The result? Fragmentation.

When systems are misaligned -- when one team’s definition of “customer value” conflicts with another’s risk score, when a fraud model rejects what a marketing tool just qualified -- the entire organization suffers and your customers feel it.

This disconnect echoes the themes of The Alignment Problem by Brian Christian, which details how optimization without coordination leads to failure. The same is true in enterprise AI: each model may perform well locally, but unless orchestrated with shared context, they amplify confusion instead of clarity.

To build intelligent enterprises, we must rethink how we design systems—not as isolated capabilities, but as coordinated modules working in concert, like the human brain.

In A Brief History of Intelligence, Max Bennett explains that the brain uses specialized modules—vision, memory, reasoning, emotion—that constantly align and coordinate. Intelligence emerges from the interconnection, not the isolation.

If human intelligence emerges from modular but synchronized systems, then I believe enterprise intelligence should as well.

Enterprises must evolve in the same way. True intelligence—organizational or artificial—emerges when systems are aligned, modular, and designed for shared reasoning across functions. You don’t solve fragmentation by adding more AI tools. You solve it by transforming the system those tools live in.

Our current architecture fails not because the models are weak, but because the system lacks coordination.

The cost of fragmentation shows up everywhere.

A Quick Diagnostic: Is Your System Fragmented?

The signs are often hiding in plain sight—across meetings, slide decks, escalations, delays, and duplicated effort. Use this diagnostic to spot the hidden costs of system fragmentation.

Ask your team:

• • Do we make the same decision in more than one system (e.g., fraud rules, customer segmentation, pricing)?
  • Can a frontline team (call center, collections, product) act on insights within their current workflow?
  • Can we trace a bad decision back to the specific feature, rule, or model version that caused it?
  • Do different departments define the same business term differently (e.g., “active user,” “income stability”)?
  • Can we explain why a specific customer was approved, denied, flagged, or downgraded—across systems?
  • How many times are we building the same features, metrics, or connectors in different silos?
  • Do teams trust models they didn’t build themselves? Or do they rebuild to feel confident?

If the answers are unclear, inconsistent, or dependent on “asking someone who knows,” your architecture is fragmented—and you’re paying for it every day in cost, time, risk, and customer experience.

When intelligence is embedded, aligned, and composable across departments, AI stops being a buzzword—and starts behaving like the connective tissue (the mind) of a modern enterprise.

Reclaim your enterprise intelligence.

‍